Generate summary with AI

0patch is an Acros Security product, which promises to keep your end-of-life systems secure by applying tiny code snippets (micropatches) into your applications. While suitable for this specific purpose, most IT teams require more from their patch management tool, forcing them to search for 0patch alternatives.

The top 0patch alternatives make it easy to deploy patches on Windows, as well as Mac and Linux devices. Plus, a few alternatives offer Agentic AI to assist with this process.

The top 7 0patch alternatives are:

  1. Atera
  2. ManageEngine
  3. Kaseya
  4. SolarWinds
  5. Action1
  6. Pulseway
  7. Automox

Below, we review everything you need to know about the best 0patch alternatives. For each alternative, we’ve outlined the key features, pricing, and any potential limitations.

The 7 best 0patch alternatives for 2026

Let’s now review the best 0patch alternatives.

1. Atera

Atera Hompage Screenshot

Atera vs. 0patch: Key differences

1. Key features: While 0patch is built for managing Windows patches, Atera takes a broader approach with its all-in-one Agentic AI platform for IT management.

Atera’s RMM includes patch management, a ticketing system, network discovery, remote access, and asset management, all powered by our autonomous IT agents.

With Atera’s patch management tool, you can deploy patches on Windows, Mac, and Linux devices, as well as third-party applications. You can set up patch schedules and gain full visibility into patch statuses, missed updates, and device health.

IT automation profiles
Atera IT automation profile

2. Agentic AI: Of all the 0patch alternatives, only Atera offers Agentic AI technology, capable of eliminating 40% of your IT workload.

Atera’s IT Autopilot and AI Copilot handle manual and repetitive tasks, like installing software, guiding end-users, troubleshooting devices, and proactively looking for issues, fully autonomously.

CAD Viewer
Atera’s IT Autopilot in action

Atera’s all-in-one, Agentic AI approach makes it the best overall 0patch alternative for most enterprises.

3. Pricing: 0patch and Atera employ different pricing structures: 0patch uses pay-per-device, while Atera pay-per-technician. 

0patch’s paid pricing plans start from €24.95/month per computer, per year. With Atera, you can manage unlimited devices for a fixed monthly cost, starting from just $149/month, per technician. Atera’s fair per-technician pricing makes scaling affordable and more predictable.

4: User ratings: Atera is one of the highest rated 0patch alternatives, based solely on user reviews. Below is how users have rated Atera against other 0patch alternatives, on key categories like ease of use and support:

G2 comparison of Atera, ManageEngine, Kaseya and SolarWinds

As you can see, Atera is rated higher across all key categories. You can access the full G2 comparison here.

Pricing and value for money

Unlike 0patch, which charges pay-per-device, Atera lets you manage and deploy patches on unlimited devices. You simply pay for the number of technicians using the platform.

Atera's IT department pricing

Atera pricing plans for IT departments:

  • Professional: $149 per month, per technician
  • Expert: $189 per month, per technician
  • Master: $219 per month, per technician
  • Enterprise: Custom quotation; contact sales to get pricing

Atera pricing plans for MSPs:

  • Pro: $129 per month, per technician
  • Growth: $179 per month, per technician
  • Power: $209 per month, per technician
  • Superpower (Enterprise): Custom quotation; contact sales to get pricing

Customer reviews and ratings

Atera’s G2 Rating: 4.6 out of 5 stars (950+ reviews)

What Atera users are saying on G2:

  • “Atera allowed us to combine our old systems and gave us more options for automation, patch management, and troubleshooting,” a G2 user says.
  • “The ease of use, pricing, and the multitude of integrations with other products. Implementation is very easy, and rollout of a new system is very quick. Has saved me many hours of work,” a G2 user says.

Atera’s Capterra Rating: 4.6 out of 5 stars (440+ reviews)

What Atera users are saying on Capterra:

  • “Patch management feature across OS platforms, Windows, Mac, Ubuntu, and third party application is very good,” a Capterra user says.
  • “Patch management for OS updates was done automatically, as well as creating scripts which could be pushed automatically or with a click of a button,” a Capterra user says.

2. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

Screenshot of ManageEngine patch manager plus homepage

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is suitable for patching Windows, Mac, and Linux devices, as well as third-party applications. Its system helps to scan and identify missing patches, and then update them automatically.

Compared to Atera, Patch Manager Plus lacks broader IT management capabilities, like ticketing, RMM, and remote access.

G2 Rating: 4.5 out of 5.0 stars (180+ reviews)

Capterra Rating: 4.6 out of 5.0 stars (330+ reviews)

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Pricing:

  • Free plan: Only suitable for small-scale patch management.
  • Professional: Starting from $245/year per technician
  • Enterprise: Starting from $345/year per technician

3. Kaseya VSA

Screenshot of Kaseya's RMM page

Kaseya VSA is an IT management solution that offers capabilities for Windows and Mac patch management. It helps you set up policy profiles, manage patch approvals, and set up schedules.

Like 0patch, Kaseya VSA’s pricing is pay-per-device. Compared to Atera’s per-device pricing, the per-device pricing can make scaling less cost-effective.

G2 Rating: 4.0 out of 5.0 (300+ reviews)

Capterra Rating: 4.1 out of 5.0 (200+ reviews)

Kaseya VSA Pricing:

  • Kaseya doesn’t make its pricing plans public. To get it, you need to contact their sales team.

4. SolarWinds Patch Manager

SolarWinds patch management

SolarWinds Patch Manager is a Windows patch management software that sends you automated alerts when patches are available and helps to deploy them based on your patch schedule.

Unlike Atera, SolarWinds is solely for patching Windows devices, arguably leaving a gap for organizations with multi-OS environments.

G2 Rating: 4.0 out of 5.0 stars (50+ reviews)

Capterra Rating: 4.3 out of 5.0 stars (10+ reviews)

SolarWinds Patch Manager Pricing:

  • Custom pricing: Pricing starts at $1,851. To find out the exact pricing, contact the SolarWinds sales team.

5. Action1

Action1 Homepage Screenshot. It says, "Patching That Just Works."

Action1 helps organizations deploy OS and third-party app updates. Patch management is its main feature, but it also comes with simple endpoint management capabilities.

While effective for patching, Action1 lacks broader RMM and Agentic AI capabilities. Atera not only offers leading patch management, but also combines other IT management capabilities.

G2 Rating: 4.9 out of 5.0 (500+ reviews)

Capterra Rating: 4.9 out of 5.0 (200+ reviews)

Action1 Pricing:

  • Custom quotation: To get pricing from Action1, you need to request a quote from their website.

6. Pulseway

Pulseway homepage picture. It says, "An IT Management Solution That You Can Take Anywhere."

Pulseway is an IT management platform with RMM, patch management, ticketing, and a remote access system. Like 0patch, its pricing is based on pay-per-device.

Pulseway is part of Kaseya and comes with a simple AI assistant (Cooper AI). While helpful for automating simple IT tasks, it isn’t capable of autonomously handling them, unlike Atera’s IT Autopilot.

G2 Rating: 4.6 out of 5.0 (100+ reviews)

Capterra Rating: 4.7 out of 5.0 (300+ reviews)

Pulseway Pricing:

  • Basic, custom pricing is available. Visit their website to find out what the price is based on your own situation.

7. Automox

Automox homepage

Automox is a patch management tool built for deploying OS updates on Windows, macOS, and Linux devices. Unlike 0patch, it’s suitable for managing cross-OS patches. It also combines basic endpoint automation into the same software.

However, Automox is largely limited to patching and endpoint automation. Unlike Atera, it doesn’t support features like full RMM, remote access, and ticketing.

G2 Rating: 4.4 out of 5.0 stars (200+ reviews)

Capterra Rating: 4.7 out of 5.0 stars (140+ reviews)

Automox Pricing:

  • Patch OS: $1 per endpoint per month for patch management
  • Automate Essentials: Pricing is based on a custom quotation; please contact Automox for details
  • Automate Enterprise: Based on a custom quotation

Why look for a 0patch alternative?

Based on our own research and the opinions of users, these are the main limitations of 0patch:

1. Users have security concerns

0patch works by giving Acros Security (parent company of 0patch) access to inject code into your system’s memory.

Many 0patch users on this Reddit thread raised concerns about this practice, saying this can expand the system’s attack surface.

A screenshot of a Reddit comment by user polypolyman

This differs from most best patch management tools, which apply updates by installing official vendor patches.

2. Limited capabilities

0patch is mainly designed to keep Windows 10 and earlier versions up-to-date, and isn’t suitable for IT teams with multi-OS environments (e.g., Linux and Mac) and broader IT management needs.

0patch alternatives, like Atera, offer support for not only Windows devices but also Mac and Linux, making it a superior option for most.

3. Lack of AI advancements

0patch hasn’t made any AI advancements into its platform that would help users deploy patches more efficiently.

In contrast, few other 0patch alternatives have already done this. For example, Atera’s IT Autopilot assists end-users in autonomously installing/updating software, freeing up technicians for more strategic tasks.

What are 0patch’s strengths?

Here are the advantages of 0patch that users have reported:

1. Suitable for patching Windows 10 and earlier versions

0patch can be suitable for IT teams that want to keep their Windows 10 or earlier versions up-to-date with security updates. If you have a multi-OS environment, it lacks the capabilities.

2. Works in the background

Like most patch management tools, 0patch works mainly in the background, causing minimal disruption to users.

However, there’s a lack of AI advancements, which would further boost automation and proactive patching.

0patch pros and cons: Takeaways

To conclude the two previous sections, these are the pros and cons of 0patch:

The pros:

  • Suitable for patching Windows 10 and earlier versions
  • Works in the background, causing minimal disruption

The cons:

  • Users have raised security concerns about 0patch
  • Capabilities are limited mainly to Windows 10 patching
  • There have been no AI advancements made

Summary: when to switch from 0patch to another alternative

If you still rely entirely on end-of-life Windows devices and want to keep them secure, 0patch can be a suitable option. But for organizations with Windows 11 devices or cross-OS (Mac and Linux), 0patch quickly falls short.

The best 0patch enterprise alternative, Atera, offers patch management not only for Windows but also for Linux and Mac devices.

Not only is Atera one of the leading patch management tools, but also a leading RMM and AIOps tool. Atera was selected by both G2 and SourceForge as the top AIOps tool in the IT management space.

If you’re ready to transform your IT management from automated to fully autonomous, Atera makes that possible. And it’s easy to get started with Atera’s 30-day free trial!

Frequently Asked Questions

Was this helpful?

Related Articles

The 7 Best Patch My PC Alternatives in 2026

Read now

The 7 Best Rev.io Alternatives Your IT Team Can Use In 2026

Read now

Top 7 Aisera Alternatives for 2026

Read now

7 Best Autotask PSA Alternatives for 2026

Read now

Endless IT possibilities

Boost your productivity with Atera’s intuitive, centralized all-in-one platform